New laws will be passed after the shooting at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said on May 27.
“Do we expect any laws to come out of this devastating crime? The answer is yes. Absolutely yes,” said Abbott, a Republican.
Those laws will be “in multiple different subject areas,” he added.
One area will be making schools safer. He also wants laws that address the “array of healthcare issues that relate to those who commit gun crimes.”
“The status quo is unacceptable. This crime is unacceptable. We’re not going to be here and talking about it and do nothing about it. We will be looking for the best laws that we can get passed to make our communities and schools safer,” Abbott said.
Governors across the nation, and members of Congress, have discussed new legislation following the shooting, which left 21 dead, and the shooter, at Robb Elementary School on May 24.
Some legislators and governors see the need for bills that curb access to guns, but Abbott suggested he isn’t of the same mind.
Pressed on whether he’d support legislation to tighten background checks, Abbott said background checks can be avoided, pointing to how the Dimitrios Pagourtzis, a 17-year-old who carried out the shooting in Santa Fe, Texas, in 2018, took the gun he used from a parent.
“Anyone who suggests, ‘well, maybe we should focus on background checks as opposed to mental health.’ I suggest to you is mistaken,” Abbott said.
The Republican also brushed aside talk about moving the legal age to buy rifles to 21, noting that 18-year-olds in Texas have been able to buy the guns for some 150 years and school shootings have only recently started happening.
Salvador Ramos, the alleged Uvalde shooter, was 18 and legally bought two guns.
State. Sen. Roland Gutierrez, a Democrat, interrupted the briefing to urge Abbott to call a special session so lawmakers can reconvene, and said the session should focus on gun laws.
“We have to do something,” Gutierrez said, adding that he feels 18-year-olds shouldn’t have guns.
The Texas Democratic Party, meanwhile, called for a bill that would ban “assault weapons,” which it did not define.
“The Texas Democratic Party joins their call for a special session to ban assault weapons and pass life-saving legislation to end gun violence in Texas,” Gilberto Hinojosa, the party chairman, said in a statement.
Texas House Speaker Dade Phelan, a Republican, has largely aligned with Abbott, saying he thinks the focus should be on mental health legislation as opposed to bills concerning firearms.
I still want to know where an 18 year old got the money for an AR-15? Is that why he shot his grandmother? Stole it from her and she confronted him about the missing money and the new rifle?
CantbePC, adding to your puzzlement is the observation that he reportedly shot his grandmother because he didn’t want to or couldn’t pay for his phone service. Follow the money. Did he come into some wealth when he turned 18? How did he pay for the rifles and ammunition, a credit card? Who would issue a c/c to an unemployed, 18 year old, high school dropout? Either the credit card belonged to someone else or an over-incentivized bank employee issued a c/c without verifying information on the application.
It was reported he used his own debit card for the purchases. He had been working.
I am surprised that the democrat politicians aren’t fleeing Texas again as they have done before. If the Gov. is successful in passing some of these new laws he is proposing, many of the democrat and rino politicians will be confined to mental health facilities. Maybe they will be able to fall back on the Affordable Care Act to cover some of their mental health care expenses.
“Shall not be infringed”.
Passing new laws like that’s going to make any difference to a criminal? How about locking up the criminals & criminally insane & keeping them locked up. Aside from that, there’s something fishy about this entire tragedy. Epoch News reporting that this 18 yr old fired the gun for 12 minutes prior to entering the school. And no one HEARD him kill granny? No bolo? And where was the resource officer when he “heard” about the situation, then “rushed” to the school? All so fishy.