Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

News

Pennsylvania Senate Debate: Dr. Oz Declares Victory Over Fetterman

Following Pennsylvania’s first and only debate between U.S. Senate candidates Dr. Mehmet Oz and John Fetterman Tuesday night, the Oz campaign declared victory and said their Republican candidate would best “represent all Pennsylvanians.”

The Oz campaign released a statement shortly after the debate concluded that said Dr. Oz, a celebrity doctor, would “find common-sense solutions to lower costs for families.”

The campaign also argued that Fetterman, a Democrat and the state’s Lieutenant Governor, has “radical and dangerous policies” that would “put criminals over Pennsylvania families.”

“The contrast between Dr. Oz and John Fetterman was clear during tonight’s debate. Radical John Fetterman couldn’t defend why he has repeatedly pushed for extreme policies like decriminalizing heroin, banning fracking, and pardoning cold-blooded murderers,” said Oz Campaign Manager Casey Contres. “Dr. Oz articulated how he would restore balance to Washington and find common-sense solutions to lower costs for families and make our streets safer.”

During the debate, the two candidates answered questions about abortion, fracking, and crime.

On the issue of abortion, Fetterman said the procedure should be legalized by Congress while Oz said there should be a conversation between “a woman, her doctor, [and] local political leaders.”

“There should not be involvement from the federal government in how states decide their abortion decisions,” Oz said. “As a physician, I’ve been in the room when there are some difficult conversations happening. I don’t want the federal government involved with that at all. I want women, doctors, local political leaders, letting the democracy that’s always allowed our nation to thrive, to put the best ideas forward so states can decide for themselves.”

The Republican also said he would support drilling for oil, commonly known as fracking — an issue that is particularly important to Pennsylvania voters. However, Fetterman, who previously opposed fracking, seemed to reverse this stance during the debate.

“I’ve always supported fracking and I always believe that independence with our energy is critical, and we can’t be held, you know, ransom to somebody like Russia,” Fetterman said. “I’ve always believed that energy independence is critical and I’ve always believed that — and I do support fracking, never taken any money from their industry, but I support how critical it is that we produce our energy and create energy independence.”

Pressed by the moderator on how he would “square” his previous comments against this new position, Fetterman said: “I do support fracking, and I don’t, I don’t — I support fracking, and I stand, and I do support fracking.”

The two candidates found common ground on the U.S. Supreme Court and on preventing additional seats from being added.

When asked if the highest court in the country should expand its number of justices, Fetterman answered: “I don’t believe in that.”

“It’s not about changing the rules. It’s about acknowledging where we’re at,” he added.

Oz similarly said he would not change the court’s current nine-member bench: “I would never touch the makeup of the Supreme Court.”

The crucial Pennsylvania Senate race has drawn national attention including endorsements from former President Donald Trump, who backs Oz, and President Joe Biden, who is backing Fetterman.

The Senate’s current 50-50 tie has made each race in the upper chamber particularly important as both Republicans and Democrats are intent on winning a majority.

The two candidates are running to fill a U.S. Senate seat to represent Pennsylvania which will be vacated by a retiring Pat Toomey. Toomey, who has been a senator since 2011, will be retiring at the end of his term on January 3, 2023.

Several national polls show Oz still trailing Fetterman by about 2.3 points — or within the margin of error.

3 Comments
  • Slim says:

    It is sad that Fettterman in his condition was subjected to this debate. However, with that said, the process was not chosen by either it is the process and Fetterman was outed for his unfortunate shortcomings. Fetterman’s own party is culpable in requiring his showing up for the debate and for allowing him to even be a candidate in his physical condition.

  • Michael says:

    Fetterman has no business being in the Senate. I’m not saying that because I don’t want another Democrap Senator, which I don’t; I’m saying it because he is literally unfit to serve. On a personal level, I am truly sorry for what he has endured. I don’t know what the laws are, but the Democraps need to do whatever is necessary to, within the law, run another candidate.

    Unfortunately, what will happen is Fetterman will probably get 45+% of the vote just because he has a D by his name. And that is the reason our country is in such a mess right now. We can blame politicians, but we vote for them. Even if Biden cheated, which I think he did, he received enough legitimate votes to make the steal possible. He was as unfit to serve as Fetterman, and it was obvious before the Democrap primaries elected him. Yet people voted for Biden. So sad.

    • guest says:

      You are correct when you say fetterman will get 45% of the vote. The reason is that you can not fix stupid. Ignorance can be fixed, stupidity is forever. When there is a D next to the name, the D people will vote for it.

  • Trending Today

    News

    As Arizona’s Cochise County on Thursday moved to certify the results of the Nov. 8 election, lawyers for GOP candidates Kari Lake and Mark...

    News

    Pfizer’s CEO has been rapped by the UK’s pharmaceutical watchdog for making “misleading” statements about children’s vaccines, The Telegraph can disclose. Dr Albert Bourla...

    News

    Hunter Biden’s laptop from hell, the story that Democrats and their allies in the mainstream media tried desperately to squash in the weeks before...

    News

    In May, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky signed into law No. 7172-1 that will ban opposition parties and seize their property. The law targets opposition...

    >