Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


NewsGuard & US Govt. Sued By Consortium News

An independent news publisher on Monday sued the federal government and a “watchdog” group that touts itself as a media fact-checker, claiming First Amendment violations and defamation.

Consortium for Independent Journalism filed the lawsuit against NewsGuard Technologies, Inc. and the U.S. government in the Southern District of New York, accusing the organization of defaming Consortium News and conspiring with the government to violate the First Amendment.

The United States of America and NewsGuard “are engaged in a pattern and practice of labelling, stigmatizing and defaming American media organizations that oppose or dissent from American foreign and defense policy, particularly as to Russia and Ukraine,” the lawsuit reads.

According to the lawsuit, NewsGuard and the federal government formed an alliance under an element of the Intelligence Community known as the Pentagon Cyber Command.

The contract between the two defendants allegedly coerces news outlets to “alter viewpoints” through a NewsGuard program called the “misinformation fingerprints” project, which reportedly received a $750,000 government grant in September 2021.

The lawsuit claims NewsGuard’s software has targeted and defamed Consortium News since the outlet was formed in 1995.

“NewsGuard attaches automatically (and arbitrarily) its electronic ‘brand safety’ or ‘nutrition’ labels to all works of a targeted media organization that appear on a NewsGuard subscriber’s search engine and social media platforms, thereby defaming the entirety of a news organization’s output and slandering its reputation for integrity,” the lawsuit reads.

Bruce Afran, Consortium News’s attorney, reportedly said, “The First Amendment rights of all American media are threatened by this arrangement with the Defense Department to defame and abridge the speech of U.S. media groups.”

“When media groups are condemned by the government as ‘anti-U.S.’ and are accused of publishing ‘false content’ because they disagree with U.S. policies, the result is self-censorship and a destruction of the public debate intended by the First Amendment,” Afran said.

The publisher seeks a permanent injunction for the court to deem the program unconstitutional, prohibit the federal government and NewsGuard from continuing the alliance, and more than $13 million in damages.

The independent news publisher’s lawsuit comes a week after former State Department official Mike Benz, executive director of the Foundation for Freedom Online, claimed NewsGuard allegedly partnered with the European Union to develop codes to combat “mis- and disinformation” on the X social media platform.

The claim sparked a series of posts accusing NewsGaurd of working with other government agencies and organizations to discredit dissenting views from news outlets and influencers.

X-owner Elon Musk called NewsGuard a “scam” and said that the organization should be “disbanded immediately,” noting that “[a]nything with a name that sounds like it came out of an Orwell novel should never be trusted.”

NewsGuard’s Matt Skibinski reportedly called the organization “an alternative” to government suppression.

“NewsGuard was created as an alternative to the black-box algorithms that decide which news content is promoted and which is not on Big Tech platforms — and as an alternative to any government censorship of content,” he said in a statement to Newsmax last week.

  • Leslie says:

    I am 45 years old and consider myself to be fairly well educated, with a master’s degree. I had never in my life heard the words “mis/disinformation” before Biden came into office. Is it just me, or are they inventing words to justify policing free speech? I HATE hearing those words. And anyone who uses those words I have zero respect for, because all they are doing is promoting Biden’s Nazi propaganda.

    • Al B says:

      The words dis-and misinformation have dictionary definitions and can provide useful information. The problem is that the left has co-opted those words and trashed their definitions. Since Biden came into office those words are both code for “anything the person using the term disagrees with.” In other words, two perfectly valid words have been rendered worthless.

  • maga24 says:

    Joe Biden took 200k from his brother that he got for selling out his country, then he paid 3m in cash for a house.

    Guess which ‘news’ outlets are not reporting these 2 true stories?
    Fake news by omission ! Newsguard can eat a dick.

  • Trending Today


    An illegal immigrant has been arrested in connection with the murder of a 16-year-old Texas high school cheerleader named Lizbeth Medina, whose slain body...


    Houston elected Democratic state Sen. John Whitmire as its next mayor on Saturday night, elevating a Texas lawmaker who has represented the city for...


    A three-judge panel has blocked major parts of New York state’s anti-gun law while allowing the state to create “sensitive sites” that limit where...


    In late November, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer signed legislation that essentially bans fossil fuels in the state by the year 2040. This week, she...