Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

News

News Stations Air ‘Results’ for Primary Election That’s a Week Away: Report

The writer Ralph Waldo Emerson once famously made a sly quip about those who look guilty by trying too hard to not to look guilty: “The louder he talked of his honor, the faster we counted our spoons.”

This adage applies to the reaction to a mistake made by at least two Michigan television stations last week. Kalamazoo television station WWMT, a CBS affiliate, published the results of the primary elections, listing the winners and losers.

The problem is, the election is not until Aug. 2.

WWMT News Channel 3 released a statement explaining the mix-up. “In advance of Michigan’s Tuesday, Aug. 2 primary election, News Channel 3 was conducting a test of its election systems last week. In doing so, the station inadvertently published mock results on WWMT.com. The numbers used were randomly generated and did not reflect actual results.

“’Despite this regrettable human error, we remain committed to accuracy, transparency, and fairness in our reporting,’ said News Channel 3 News Director, Matt Johnson.”

It is not clear when the phony results were published, or how long they remained up. Michigan news site MLive reported that at least one other station made a similar error. “At least two Michigan television stations published the data sent out by the Associated Press to the news outlets to test election systems over the weekend,” according to the site.

The MLive report quoted NBC affiliate WOOD-TV News Director Stanton Tang as saying that his station encountered a problem similar to that at WWMT.

WOOD “conducts data tests ahead of every election cycle to ensure that computer system updates or replacements do not interfere with the receipt of the data stream on election day, according to a statement published Monday afternoon.

“Tang said the test election data cannot be accessed on the website’s navigation menu or in any recent election reports. But over the weekend, readers found the test data results page, which was possible through an internet search or by following a link to the page in an article about a previous election, he said.

“In no way does a standard data test either affect or predict the results of any election,” Tang wrote, according to MLive. “Test data does not represent any editorial slant or desire to affect the outcome of the election.”

The erroneous election outcomes have been removed from WWMT’s news site, and appear to be unavailable to review. It would have been interesting to analyze the candidates the news station picked as the winners.

Government officials raced to put out statements decrying misinformation. Not the misinformation by the TV stations that published supposed election tallies a week in advance, but by anonymous others who might use the error to question election integrity.

The “fact check” tweeted out by Michigan Department of State contained a sternly worded criticism. “Online sites that regularly spread conspiracy theories, misinformation and other falsehoods have unsurprisingly seized on this as evidence of something nefarious when it is nothing more than human error by an organization that has nothing to do with election administration.”

Fox News 47 assisted with building the narrative. They referenced Michigan’s Department of State Director of Media Relations Tracy Wimmer, reporting her concerns that “this mistake has been used as a tool to spread misinformation and discredit the security of Michigan’s election process.”

Malachi Barnett of the news site Bridge Detroit echoed the message: The real problem, he said, are those who notice media malpractice during election season.

It’s ironic someone from Detroit, long considered a hub of election corruption, expressed concerns about the discrediting of Michigan’s election process.

It’s understandable the media would need to test their equipment before an important event like an election. It is odd that the results were allowed to go live and get distributed.

Five years ago, this would have been less of a story. The elites, however, have earned distrust through their own attitudes and actions.

After the disastrous hostility and mismanagement unleashed by swamp politicians and the establishment media during Trump’s first term and the 2020 election, we need to be more, not less, skeptical of the official version of events.

12 Comments
  • Carrie says:

    So did anyone grab the results. Would love to see who’s been picked.

  • Phil Barberg says:

    The media is an excellent tool to convince voters not to vote. They will see their candidate of choice way ahead and then not bother going to cast their vote. Then the numbers flip at the count. Remember when the media told everyone that Hilary was wining the presidency at the pole surveys! Poles are only good for stacking toilet paper rolls. So what party won in this “test” count?? Sounds like Dominion is busy getting their machines warmed up and programmed with the desired results.

  • Louis Galmarini says:

    Until EVERY State re-institutes the safeguards which were in place GUARANTEEING voter integrity, INCLUDING photo I.D. and paper ballots only, (read: NO MACHINES), and to be HAND-COUNTED – WE WILL NEVER HAVE ANOTHER FAIR ELECTION.

  • Trending Today

    News

    As Arizona’s Cochise County on Thursday moved to certify the results of the Nov. 8 election, lawyers for GOP candidates Kari Lake and Mark...

    News

    Pfizer’s CEO has been rapped by the UK’s pharmaceutical watchdog for making “misleading” statements about children’s vaccines, The Telegraph can disclose. Dr Albert Bourla...

    News

    Hunter Biden’s laptop from hell, the story that Democrats and their allies in the mainstream media tried desperately to squash in the weeks before...

    News

    In May, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky signed into law No. 7172-1 that will ban opposition parties and seize their property. The law targets opposition...

    >