Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

News

Here Are 17 States That May Copy Cali’s Electric Car Mandate

Seventeen states with vehicle emission standards tied to rules established in California face weighty decisions on whether to follow that state’s strictest-in-the nation new rules that require all new cars, pickups and SUVs to be electric or hydrogen powered by 2035.

Under the Clean Air Act, states must abide by the federal government’s standard vehicle emissions standards unless they at least partially opt to follow California’s stricter requirements.

Among them, Washington, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon and Vermont are expected to adopt California’s ban on new gasoline-fueled vehicles; Colorado and Pennsylvania are among the states that probably won’t.

The legal ground is a bit murkier in Minnesota, where the state’s “Clean Cars” rule has been a political minefield and the subject of a legal fight. Meanwhile, Republicans are rebelling in Virginia.

The Minnesota Auto Dealers Association says its reading of state and federal law is that the new California rules kick in automatically in the state, and it’s making that case in court as it tries to block them.

“The technology is such that the vehicles just don’t perform that well in cold weather,” said Scott Lambert, the trade group’s president. “We don’t all live in southern California.”

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency officials say the state would have to launch an entirely new rulemaking process to adopt California’s changes. And in court filings and legislative hearings, they’ve said they are not planning to do that now.

“We are not California. Minnesota has its own plan,” Gov. Tim Walz said in a statement. He called Minnesota’s program “a smart way to increase, rather than decrease, options for consumers. Our priority is to lower costs and increase choices so Minnesotans can drive whatever vehicle suits them.”

Oregon regulators are taking public comments through Sept. 7 on whether to adopt the new California standards. Colorado regulators, who adopted California’s older rules, won’t follow California’s new ones, the administration of Democratic Gov. Jared Polis said.

“While the governor shares the goal of rapidly moving towards electric vehicles, he is skeptical about requiring 100% of cars sold to be electric by a certain date as technology is rapidly changing,” the Colorado Energy Office said in a statement.

Regulators in Pennsylvania, which only partially adopted California’s older standards, said they won’t automatically follow its new rules. Under Democratic Governor Tom Wolf, Pennsylvania started the regulatory process last year to fully conform with California’s rules, but abandoned it.

Virginia had been on a path to adopting California’s rules under legislation that passed last year when Democrats were in full control of Virginia’s government. But Republicans who control the House of Delegates and GOP Gov. Glenn Youngkin say they’ll push to unlink their state.

Minnesota’s auto dealers are trying to make their state’s current rules — and the possibility that they could tighten to incorporate California’s new restrictions — an issue for the fall elections.

Control of the Legislature and governor’s office are up for grabs, and the dealers hope to persuade the 2023 Legislature to roll back the regulations unless they win in court first, Lambert said.

The MPCA, with Walz’s support, adopted California’s existing standards through administrative rulemaking last year amid a bitter fight with Republican lawmakers who were upset that the Legislature was cut out of the decision.

Legislators even tried unsuccessfully to withhold funding from Minnesota’s environmental agencies. One casualty was Laura Bishop, who resigned as MPCA commissioner after it became apparent that she lacked the votes in the GOP-controlled Senate to win confirmation.

Walz and his administration have framed Minnesota’s Clean Cars rule as a fairly painless way to increase the availability of electric vehicles and help the state meet its greenhouse gas reduction goals.

The rule seeks to increase the offerings of battery-powered and hybrid vehicles starting with the 2025 model year by requiring manufacturers to comply with California standards currently in force for low- and zero-emission vehicles.

Lambert said the state’s auto dealers don’t oppose electric vehicles. They currently make up 2.3 percent of new vehicle sales in Minnesota and he expects consumer interest to continue to grow.

But the reduced range of battery-powered vehicles in cold weather makes them less attractive in northern tier states, he said. Minnesota’s rules already threaten to saddle dealers with more electric vehicles than their customers will buy, he said, and adopting the California ban would make things worse.

Under federal law, by Lambert’s reading, states have to either adopt California’s rules in full or follow less stringent federal emission standards. He said they can’t pick and choose from parts of each.

That effectively means there’s a “ban on the books” in Minnesota for sales of new conventionally fueled vehicles starting with the 2035 model year, he said.

Lambert’s association was already fighting Minnesota’s existing Clean Car rules in the Minnesota Court of Appeals, and its petition foresaw that California would make the changes it announced late last month. A key issue in whether “any future amendments to the incorporated California regulations automatically become part of Minnesota rules,” as the dealers argue.

The MPCA’s attorneys assert that they don’t, and have asked the court to dismiss the challenge.

MPCA Commissioner Katrina Kessler has made similar arguments for months, including before a skeptical state Senate committee last March.

Aaron Klemz, chief strategy officer for the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, which will be filing its own arguments against the dealers in court, acknowledged that the legal landscape is confusing. And he said it’s not clear whether his group will eventually call for Minnesota to follow California’s new ban.

“We haven’t done enough analysis of the California rule to know if we’re going to push for its adoption in Minnesota,” Klemz said.

He noted that other issues are coming into play, including incentives for electric vehicles in the Inflation Reduction Act that President Joe Biden recently signed, and the stated intentions by some of the major automakers to go all-electric.

Ed. note: Over 40 percent of all light-duty cars sales in the country could potentially be affected by this rule. The 17 states are listed in the document below:

READ 23 COMMENTS
  • Nanny says:

    HMMM – peple cannot afford to heat or cool their homes because their electric bills are too high, they have electric roll outs because there is NOT enough electricity to serve them,

    TELL ME AGAIN, WHERE DO ELECTRIC CARS GET THEIR POWER SOURCE, AND HOW MUCH DOES IT COST?

    BRAINDEAD, BRAINWASHED, IGNORANT OR STUPID? IMHO those people fit the entire spectrum.

    SAVE AMERICA

    AMERICA FIRST

    VOTE REPUBLICAN – OUST ALL WOKE DEMONIC-RAT LIBERAL NEW WORLD ORDER ~ ANTI -AMERICANS AND RINOS

  • Larry Bowling says:

    Virtually all of those states mentioned are run by the liberal green people who care nothing about their citizens. They only care about being viewed as good little green soldiers that do exactly what the green people force them to do because the green people can control election dollars and election votes. Get some state governors with a backbone and watch those numbers turn away from electric cars. How do you think electric cars are charged? It is by coal, natural gas and crude oil. There will never be enough windmills and solar panels to make that program work.
    WAKE UP AMERICA AND DO NOT FALL FOR THIS SCAM OF THE GREEN WOKE FOLKS!!!

  • GymS says:

    Time to go in the garage and fire up the Fox body’s 347 stroker, which is running on 112 octane racing fuel, let it idle awhile. No problem since this is all a money making scheme by the looney left. Noted and world renowned meteorologist Tom Skilling has researched and found the average temperatures have risen 1/2 of 1 degree over the past 170 years. And what’s more? This is a normal cycle the earth goes through; slight warming then slight cooling. Notice aoc or Xi den never mention the pollution from their handlers in china or in India? And califweirda has now told people NOT to charge their cars. The grid cant do cars and a/c at the same time.

  • JAMES FISKE says:

    E V equipment and vehicles makes NO SINCE AT ALL DUE TO ITS SHORT TERM UTILIATION BEFORE IT MUST BE RECHARGED!!!! ESPECIALL TRUE IN NORTHER STATES BELOW 60 DEGREES.
    I WILL NEVER OWN ANY OF IT….

  • Mr Sagacious says:

    Before I read the story, I named the seventeen states I thought it would be. Then I read the story. I got 17 out of seventeen. Which proves it’s 100% political. It’s authoritarian socialism and has NOTHING to do with the environment or the myth of “man-made” global warming.

  • TOP STORIES

    News

    The father of would-be Donald Trump assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks has revealed the family is just trying to “take care of ourselves” — as...

    News

    Former President Donald Trump reacted to Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle’s Tuesday announcement that she had resigned from her position following backlash over how...

    News

    A U.S. senator is demanding answers from the head of Joe Biden’s Department of Homeland Security to allegations there was a law enforcement agent...

    News

    Prince Harry is set to receive a rather hefty 40th birthday present later this year, according to a report. The Duke of Sussex will...

    >