Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

News

Federal Judge Rejects Lawsuit to Remove Trump from Ballot

A federal judge in West Virginia rejected a bid Thursday to remove former President Donald Trump from the state’s ballot, rebuffing a bid from a little-known presidential candidate to remove the former president.

District Judge Irene Berger ruled that John Anthony Castro, the candidate who filed a lawsuit against President Trump, lacked the standing to sue. She sided with attorneys for President Trump, Secretary of State Mac Warner, and the West Virginia GOP to dismiss Mr. Castro’s suit.

U.S. District Judge Irene Berger wrote that the evidence that Mr. Castro had submitted removes “any doubt that Mr. Castro’s purported ‘campaign’ exists as a vehicle for pursuing litigation, not votes,” adding that he could not prove any political activity in the state aside from the lawsuit that he filed.

Mr. Castro, who is based in Texas, has filed at least two dozen lawsuits against the former president to remove him from respective states’ ballots in recent weeks. Earlier this month, a judge in Arizona dismissed a similar lawsuit.

His lawsuit had argued that President Trump should be disbarred from appearing on the state’s ballot because Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution stipulates that anyone who engaged in an insurrection against the United States cannot be a presidential candidate. The U.S. Supreme Court declined in October to hear the appeal of a similar case that Mr. Castro brought in Florida.

A court in Colorado recently ruled that the former president—under the judges’ reading of the provision—cannot appear on the state’s ballots, although the case is likely going to be appealed to the Supreme Court. The Colorado case, however, was not brought by Mr. Castro but by a left-wing activist group, the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, and headed by a board member who currently serves on the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s advisory council.

But as Mr. Castro had “alleged that he is a candidate for the Republican nomination for President and anticipates being on the ballot in West Virginia,” his lawsuit “contains few specific factual allegations related to his candidacy,” Judge Berger wrote.

The judge added that “Mr. Castro’s complaint relies on supposition and speculation that if Mr. Trump were removed from the ballot, that his voters and contributors would default to other candidates including Mr. Castro,” adding that “he supplies no specifics to support the conclusion that Trump voters would become Castro voters if his suit was successful.”

“The evidence establishes that he has no campaign offices, staff, or advertising in West Virginia, does not appear in polling, has little name recognition among West Virginia Republican primary voters, and has extremely minimal campaign funds, vastly insufficient to run an actual campaign,” Judge Berger added in her ruling.

“If there were any question as to whether the allegations in the complaint are sufficient to overcome a facial challenge, the evidentiary submissions remove any doubt that Mr. Castro’s purported ‘campaign’ exists as a vehicle for pursuing litigation, not votes.”

After the judge’s ruling on Thursday, West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey hailed the order.

“In the West Virginia case attempting to kick President Trump off the ballot, we have prevailed. Strong victory for our Office and the rule of law! Colorado should learn from the wisdom of our courts!” he wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter.

In response, Mr. Castro, who frequently criticizes President Trump and other GOP candidates like Gov. Ron DeSantis, wrote on X that he disputes Judge Berger’s order, suggesting that he is not “running for President ‘in bad faith’ to ‘manufacture’ standing.”

“So if I was a corrupt POS running for President to enrich myself and corporate oligarchs, they’d find ‘good faith.’ But because I’m running for President based on my principles, they’re saying it’s in ‘bad faith.’ Our system is beyond corrupt,” he wrote. It’s not clear if he will appeal her ruling.

Federal Election Commission records show that Mr. Castro has raised zero dollars via donors. He also has not shown up in any major national or state polls.

Colorado Ruling

Citing their reading of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Colorado Supreme Court found the former president ineligible for the White House.

“A majority of the court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,” the court wrote in its 4-3 decision.

Under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, a clause stipulates that a candidate can be disqualified if a person “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against” the United States or had “given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.” While the federal government has charged the former president in relation to his activity after the 2020 election, he has not been charged with engaging in an insurrection against the U.S. government or similar crimes.

A number of legal experts and even some Democratic officials have disputed the legitimacy of the 14th Amendment-based attempts to block the former president from running. Some criticized the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling earlier this week.

READ 7 COMMENTS
  • steve says:

    fidel Castro?? Hmmm close enough. Get this POS Off the BALLOT & KEEP HIM AWAY from any Government Office. Along with the LEFT LUNATICS, This Is NOTHING MORE THAN ELECTION INTERFERENCE. The Only way the RATS CAN WIN & THEY KNOW IT. They are going to Start a Civil War if this BS continues I am afraid.

    • See more says:

      Steve I agree all the state’s wanting to take Trump off the ballot is going to be in for a big surprise if the Supreme Court don’t stop with this. Red states will take Biden off the ballot also because if the illegals coming across the border and not keeping American citizens safe. This could start civil war.

      • Russian says:

        Civil War?
        No totalitarian regime has been overthrown, destroyed or changed by voting or peaceful protests. Never in the history of mankind.

  • Steven says:

    If these communists persist on eliminating Trump any way possible they may just experience a Total ,unimaginable, irrefutable ,undeniable , INSURRECTION of no known intensity ever before exacted on these treasonous deep state operatives. A real insurrection is coming and Hell is coming with it. The need of 13 gallows fitted to work 24/7 to rid this country of all the sub-human intellectuals ruining this Great Country of ours.

  • heehawman says:

    Colorado has a majority of radical obamamite left-wingers in the supreme court. Need to get rid of them…..

  • Gloria says:

    The problem with this whole case is that President Donald Trump has NEVER been CONVICTED of starting an insurrection in ANY court in ANY country!! So how did that idiot judge come to the conclusion that he could use that clause? Dispicable!!!

  • Gloria says:

    Trump has never been convicted in any court in any country including this one of creating an insurrection!!! How that judge could allow this based on that clause! Just ridiculous!

  • TOP STORIES

    News

    Texas has won a legal skirmish in its efforts to make it a state crime to be in the country illegally. On Saturday, a...

    News

    Joe Biden’s administration has admitted transporting migrants on secret flights into the U.S. and lawyers for its immigration agencies claim revealing the locations could...

    News

    Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold expressed her disappointment at the Supreme Court’s ruling against her state’s disqualification of former President Donald Trump from...

    News

    Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis received more bad news on Monday as one of the defendants Willis’ RICO case offered to enter additional...

    >