Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

News

Court Delivers Big Win for Free Speech Advocates

A New York court has blocked a state law designed to censor “hateful conduct” on social media.

Following the Buffalo supermarket shooting in 2022, New York passed a bill requiring social media companies that operate within the state to “maintain mechanisms for reporting hateful conduct” on their platforms. Despite the “well-intentioned goal,” U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr. ruled that the First Amendment “protects from state regulation speech that may be deemed ‘hateful.’”

“The Hateful Conduct Law both compels social media networks to speak about the contours of hate speech and chills the constitutionally protected speech of social media users, without articulating a compelling governmental interest or ensuring that the law is narrowly tailored to that goal,” Carter wrote in the decision. “In the face of our national commitment to the free expression of speech, even where that speech is offensive or repugnant, Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, prohibiting enforcement of the law, is GRANTED.”

In December, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) filed the lawsuit against New York Attorney General Letitia James challenging the law on behalf of First Amendment scholar and co-founder of The Volokh Conspiracy blog Eugene Volokh, as well as the platforms Rumble and Locals.

The bill defined “hateful conduct” as “the use of a social media network to vilify, humiliate, or incite violence against a group or a class of persons on the basis of race, color, religion, ethnicity, national origin, disability, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression.”

“This decision is a big win for the First Amendment,” FIRE Attorney Daniel Ortner said. “Judge Carter correctly concluded that the law would have required websites like the Volokh Conspiracy, Rumble, and Locals to adopt censorship policies for anything the State of New York considers ‘hateful,’ requiring them to endorse the state’s view that such speech is worth singling out for removal.”

“But as Judge Carter noted, the law is written so poorly that it could apply to a post endorsing Black Lives Matter or All Lives Matter if a user found either message offensive,” he continued. “And such a vague, overboard, and coercive law offends the First Amendment. This decision ensures that New York cannot turn bloggers into big brother or social media platforms into its speech police.”

UCLA Law Professor and plaintiff on the case Eugene Volokh told the Daily Caller News Foundation that the decision “makes clear that the government can’t single out particular ideological viewpoints, by requiring platforms to have policies for dealing with those viewpoints.”

“A state couldn’t, for instance, require platforms to have policies for dealing with unpatriotic speech, or anti-police speech; likewise, it can’t require them to have policies explaining how they deal with ‘hateful’ speech,” Volokh said. “The government should stick to punishing crime, and, if it wants to, speaking out against views it disapproves of – but it can’t pass laws targeting those views for regulation.”

READ 5 COMMENTS
  • Slim says:

    Good news for Americans bad news for the government and its trolls.

  • ElonMuskAmerica'sGreatestCitizen says:

    1st Ammendment will prevail. As Democrats will go to jail. Thank You Elon Musk for spending 47 billion dollars to save our constitution. All Americans Owe This Man A Giant THANK YOU!!!

  • John says:

    We’ll see how that flips around in a couple days, in The N.W.O Babylon which is the biggest suppressor and oppressor of Rights, constitutional law, Bill of rights, & religious freedoms except for demonic embracing of the illegal Sharia protected Muslim domestic terrorist, over our constitutional citizens and laws, in their satanic state & cities of the N.W.O. Babylon, it is prophesized and will burn to the ground soon enough by the same God they say doesn’t exist, and they want to replace with a demonic Satan worshiping communist oppressive government of Antichrist self-adoring prideful immoral corrupted demons

  • Louis Galmarini says:

    Does this mean we can call certain ‘people’ NIGGERS when appropriate? Just asking.

  • TOP STORIES

    News

    The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) is hiring illegal border crossers with Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals status and equipping them with guns to...

    News

    Former President Trump would handily win the presidential election if it were held today – thanks in part to a stunning boost in support...

    News

    The misconduct hearings on efforts to oust Fulton County DA Fani Willis from the Trump RICO case have come to a close. Both sides...

    News

    Former President Donald Trump has defeated former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley in the Missouri Republican caucus, according to The Associated Press. In addition to...

    >